Independent Energy-ML Verification

Independent verification for battery & energy-system ML.

We don't build your model — we check whether its numbers survive contact with data they haven't seen.

VolMax Studio Lab is an independent verification practice for battery and energy machine-learning models: leakage detection, metric-integrity audits, physical-consistency checks. Power electronics + domain-grounded ML, with every finding reproducible from source.

The Structural Flaw

Most battery ML models are graded by the team that built them.

It is why a model reporting 98% accuracy in the lab can collapse on a cell it has never seen — the result was leakage, an inflated metric, or a curated benchmark, not prediction.

Buyers, investors, and insurers can't tell a sound model from a flattering one by reading the vendor's own numbers.

That is a conflict of interest.

VolMax is the neutral check. We don't sell a competing model, so we have no incentive to flatter a number. Independence is the product.

Services

Independent audits designed to catch interpretation artifacts.

01

1 · Battery ML Audit

Independent integrity audit of an SOH/RUL model or a vendor's accuracy claim. We check split integrity (cell-level vs cycle-level), preprocessing leakage, metric honesty (full-set error, no dropped cells), and physical consistency. Deliverable: a reproducible report where every number regenerates from one script.

02

2 · Independent SOH / RUL Verification

We reproduce a claimed result on a clean, group-aware split and report the gap between the claimed and the verified number — and trace its cause. The honest number is the one that survives a new cell.

03

3 · Power Signal & DSP Verification

Verification of measured-signal pipelines (power quality, vibration, MCSA, PV) against physics and the sensor's real resolution — built on a test-covered signal-processing core.

What you receive

A reproducible audit report; a plain verdict (where the claim holds, where it breaks, the corrected number); the regeneration script.

What we do NOT guarantee

An accuracy number. We are not selling a model, so we make no "95%" promise — that is the vendor claim we exist to test. A verifier who guarantees a flattering result has the same conflict of interest as the vendor. We do not build the model under test, and we list no client outcomes we don't have — the proof is the public work below.

Operational Doctrine

The P10 Verification Method

Every finding is produced by one procedure: reduce to first principles → hunt the interpretation artifacts (leakage, inflation, curation) → compare to state of the art → deliver a reproducible verdict. The caveat is the mechanism — each correction comes from a constraint that narrows an overclaim. We apply it to our own work first.

Read the full method →
Verification Evidence

Verified work, not promises.

The standard we hold your model to, we applied to our own first. These are public, reproducible, test-covered repositories — the credential that replaces a CV.

flagship

Battery_Health_Portfolio

NASA PCoE + Severson/Attia, DOI-archived. Honest findings led by their limits: where early prognosis breaks, where impedance is observable vs predictive, capacity-regeneration isolated from true fade. Includes the worked example where the audit caught its own pipeline overclaiming three times. Every number regenerates from reproduce.py.

github.com/VolMax-Studio/Battery_Health_Portfolio

Other verified domains

Power_Signal_Tools

Test-covered signal library (RMS, THD, DWT, Hilbert). The measurement layer the audits stand on.

Transformer_Health

Hierarchical DGA fault diagnosis, with tested boundaries.

PV_Anomaly_Detection

PV fault detection on real NREL data + injected benchmarks, honestly framed.

Data_Center_Efficiency

The "PUE Loophole" audit: how PSU conversion losses mask real facility savings.

(+ Power Quality, NILM, MCSA, CWRU, Grid Frequency, VPP — domain breadth.)

View all on GitHub →
Leadership

Ivan Nestorov — founder

20+ years in power electronics and field electrical work, now applying that hardware intuition to independent verification of energy ML. The combination is the point: a pure data scientist doesn't know why a converter loses efficiency at high frequency; a pure hardware engineer doesn't audit a model's train/test split.

VolMax stands at the intersection — between the measurement and the claim.

Physics doesn't lie. Sensors don't lie. Everything between is interpretation — and that's where I check.

Hardware & embedded R&D

Alongside the verification practice, VolMax runs hardware and edge-ML R&D — embedded signal processing on STM32/ESP32, and a hardware safety-interlock concept (analog-to-logic override, sub-2.5µs actuator-interrupt latency, Serbian IPO priority filed). These inform the measurement side of the audits and are in active development.

Get In Touch

Contact

VolMax Studio Lab d.o.o.

Independent energy-ML verification · Serbia · EU/remote engagements

Email: volmax.core@gmail.com

GitHub: github.com/VolMax-Studio

For audit enquiries, include the model type and dataset if possible.